Beast of Burden

So, I had this thought, because I suck so much.

I was considering Zeno's paradoxes a little (one of which he uses to disprove motion... kind of).

That got me thinking about how much things can suck. So, let's say Person A sucks big time. Person B sucks the biggest time. I, on the other hand, do not suck. I lack suck. There is a profound absence of suck in me. I am point 0 for suck. If it is the case that there is clearly some sort of relative measure of sucking (Person B sucks more than Person A) is it possible for me to not suck at all?

I mean, we can surely infer that the absence of sucking means that I stand in a relative position of sucking less than Person A and Person B. However, if there is a defined gradient, the difference between sucking between myself and Person A (the closer of the two to myself) can be infinitely divided, so that the best I could say about my sucking is that I suck only an eency-weency bit, and yet still a lot less than Person A, and a whole hell of a lot less than Person B. That is unless I transcend sucking. I am the target and not the arrow. I lack suck in all its forms. Other objects of suck move to meet me at point 0, the target.

My point? Everyone sucks a little, except me, because I include the absence of sucking as a premise of my nature. It is up to the individual for whom this ridiculous nonsense was posted, to prove that premise unsound.